10/30/11
-
Recent Discussion
- Glen Bayless on The Case For E.W. Jackson
- liberal anthropologist on The Case For E.W. Jackson
- Joe Budzinski on Does Corey Stewart embody everything that Americans hate about politics?
-
- Glen Bayless on The Case For E.W. Jackson
To LA..Huh? Did I say anything about support? My point is about tone and tenor. – May 18, 6:16 AM - liberal anthropologist on The Case For E.W. Jackson
Glen, what Republicans have got supported in the last 4 years? – May 17, 6:27 PM - Joe Budzinski on Does Corey Stewart embody everything that Americans hate about politics?
According to Virtucon the Lingemfelter campaign is tied to the emails from Gear. So, Corey Stewart was not behind this sordid episode. Just the other... – May 17, 5:26 PM - David Dickinson on The Case For E.W. Jackson
I've been an E.W. supporter since he showed up. Unfortunately, I'm not going to the convention this year, so my vote doesn't count. But I'm... – May 17, 1:52 PM - Joe Budzinski on The Case For E.W. Jackson
Yeah that is utterly outrageous. – May 17, 11:26 AM
- Glen Bayless on The Case For E.W. Jackson
-
-
- Al Alborn
- Bacons Rebellion
- Bearing Drift
- Below The Beltway
- Black Velvet Bruce Li
- Blue Ridge Forum
- Blue Virginia
- Bluey Blog
- Citizen Tom
- Craig Orndorff
- Crystal Clear Conservative
- Decision Virginia
- Deo Vindice
- Doorbell Queen
- Equality Loudoun
- Harrover's Blog
- Hooda Thunk
- J's Notes
- Johnny P News
- JTH mishmash
- Liz Mair
- Lloyd the Idiot
- Loudoun Conservatives
- Loudoun Economics
- Loudoun Electoral Board
- Loudoun HOA Talk
- Loudoun Opt Out
- Loudoun Progress
- Mason Conservative
- Moonhowlings
- Not Larry Sabato
- Nova Town Hall
- Rappahannock Red
- Real Advocate
- Real Loudoun
- Red NoVA
- Renaissance Ruminations
- Richmond Sunlight
- Rick Sincere
- Right On Gallows
- Right Wing Liberal
- Rightside VA
- Shad Plank
- Shaun Kenney
- Sheriff of Nottingham in PWC
- SWAC Girl
- The Chesapeake Liaison
- The Contemporary Conservative
- The Derecho
- The Richmonder
- The State of NOVA
- The Virginia Gentleman
- Tim Boyer
- UnSuck DC Metro
- Virginia Public Access Project
- Virginia State Board of Elections
- Virginia Tomorrow
- Vivian Paige
- Waldo Jaquith
- WaPo Virginia Politics
- Washington Unplugged
- Without Supervision
-
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
Recent Comments
Blogroll
Conservative Tweets
Archives
Contact Us




Damn Republicans!
I just don’t understand why the sheriff race has so much BS associated with it.
In an omen-like occurence, the heavy snow obliterated Chapman signs and Baldwin signs out this way like they were cheap suits. Higgins signs right beside them survived. Go figure!
Actually, isn’t this sign in the public right of way area? Hard to tell from the picture, but there is a right-of-way area in which signs are not allowed to be put up. Also, the county sign ordinance which all candidates signed when they got the permit to install signs, states no signs allowed AT ALL over 4 square feet.
BPM brings up an intersting point — it is curious that signs of people he doesn’t, and only thise signs, like are being destroyed…hmmmm….. Why can’t we all just get along? The Republican Sign Wars is getting a little out of hand. Maybe it’s because Dems don’t have as much money, but I rarely see these huge (illegal) banners for Dem candidates …making me wonder what our Republican candidates are really compensating for. I also wonder why crusty ole’ Frank Wolf is on every candidates mailer. Frank isn’t running for office here, and his endorsement means nada. What, you think he’d endorse someone from across the aisle? He looks like he was simply medicated and told to stand still while the cameras clicked away. The pictures make him and our local candidates all look old and crusty.
if you say so, leeter.
I notice Frank Wolf keeps getting reelected, and like the Governor, local Dems (at least in Catoctin) like to use him as an image of someone to be respected–he helped in the PATH issue, which is being used by some supporting Baldwin to attach Wolf’s gravitas and weight of respect to the Democratic candidate there, although it falls a little flat when you see that, as with many Dem constituents of Wolf, they’re glad to have his help when they need it to get what they want (see Hallowed Ground), and then equally glad to donate against him, campaign against him, and vote against him.
And then he wins again.
I am familiar with the location above and it is on private property, off the right of way. Yes, there are size restrictions as part of the ordinance but, there is a process to remedy that giving the property owner a certain amount of time to remove or replace. However, it appears we have “volunteers” violating the rules of their program to remove signs from private property. Seeing it a lot in the Dulles South area.
Yes we are. I know one place south of Braddock that has a sign on their lawn inside their fence, and they’ve had to call for a replacement every week for a month now.
Hey BPM, you know what’s odd about the snow?
It seems to have TAKEN the signs away, not knocked them down for Baldwin and Chapman.
Stay classy Republicans!
Sign wars. What a waste of time.
Yeah, what a surprise, only the Chapman and Baldwin signs were affected. Unbelievable.
It says a lot about how much law and order matters to the people who would deface, destroy, or steal signs on private property.
Makes supporting Chapman that much more attractive when his opponents’ supporters are vandals and thieves.
Can Simpson get some people investigating this? I wonder what the official reaction would be if these were Simpson signs getting destroyed.
Someone told me Simpson and Speakman were real chummy together before the Lansdowne debate. Not surprising.
The usual telephone pole trio is Dick Black, Geary Higgins, and Jim Plowman.
That’s a scary trio indeed. The pole is quite appropriate.
Don’t you think it’s telling after the private property vandalism of a Chapman sign all Monk can mention is snow?
All over a petty issue, (with a vindictive nature) with a volunteer campaign manager. May I suggest counseling?
Go figure.
The pole in in public ROW, LI. At a minimum it is on power company ROW property. Either way, its not legal signage.
I agree that the signs on poles are not appropriate, Eric, but I can’t let you accuse people of putting them there without hardcore proof. Your previous comment has been zapped.
Ok, so the only place I have seen these signs on phone poles is in Hamilton and Lovettsville. Let’s see, who do we know that is working on the R’s campaign in Lovettsville and Hamilton? No names stated, LI.
See this LTE on the issue as well:
http://www.loudountimes.com/index.php/letters/article/signs_in_political_season12/
Apparently this is happening next door in Lincoln as well.
As I said, who would vote for a BOS candidate who can not even ask his sign crews to just obey the law?
That’s better, Eric. It is pretty ridiculous after all the bitching and moaning from these people about Chapman signs appearing with Dem signs. Time for some people to start cleaning up their messes I think.
And the actual issues in all these political races were what again?